I've read thru all the posts and everyone makes good points but there really is no QB controversy.
1) Gebbia: Scrambles better
Throws on the run much better
Softer touch on screen passes
2) LUTON: Much more experience ( this covers a lot, from being a multi-year starter,
reading defenses, team leadership )
Much stronger arm ( This guy can throw 40 yds. on a rope and thread
the needle when needed. That being said he also
bounces the ball off receivers at short range )
I believe experience is the tie breaker, but as in the 1st. half of Stanford or the last half of
Hawaii I would like to see Gebbia pick up a series or two and allow Luton to collect himself,
or gebbia to make things happen.
I know there are valid arguments against this but many brag about two capable backs the each
bring something different to the table, so what about two QB's
1) Gebbia: Scrambles better
Throws on the run much better
Softer touch on screen passes
2) LUTON: Much more experience ( this covers a lot, from being a multi-year starter,
reading defenses, team leadership )
Much stronger arm ( This guy can throw 40 yds. on a rope and thread
the needle when needed. That being said he also
bounces the ball off receivers at short range )
I believe experience is the tie breaker, but as in the 1st. half of Stanford or the last half of
Hawaii I would like to see Gebbia pick up a series or two and allow Luton to collect himself,
or gebbia to make things happen.
I know there are valid arguments against this but many brag about two capable backs the each
bring something different to the table, so what about two QB's
